Not allowing the mind to exercise, leaves little space for improvement. Architecture seems to have lost its humor, its surprise.
Allowing for some contributions, some feeling to be brought out allows you to get pulled in. Architecture has long been a solitary production, this ability to project, pull and use that as a generative method of architecture allows for associations usually not attainable. Allowing for creations that could not be generated by one brain alone.
The gap between methods, the gaps between what is delivered is then personal, it is yours, to create, exploit, give meaning, forget, or disregard. Those spaces, gaps are to be invented, giving joy in the generative nature, making connections between the fragments, making things up, not tied to any pretentious assumptions of right or wrong.
The drawing has long been seen as a static creation, something that references an object for a form of analytical understanding. Allowing it to strive for a larger role, a dynamic role could find new strengths. I urge you to make your own jumps, leaps, assumptions; see your own spaces, forms, characters and rip them to life.
What if they could do more, now finally freed from their trap of construction, of pure utility, pure communication, could they do more? Could they share ideas, could they not dictate, could they not give you more than dimensions and space?
Could they not find a way to exist with new limits, playing a new game, allowing for some contamination?
Allowing the mind to take rational, accepted architectural forms and radicalize them through a process of condensation, displacement and various others allows for purely imaginative, seemingly irrational, dream like compositions.
This taps into the unconscious, allows its freedom to be tempted, for desire to push forward and rewritten the rules. Memories, history, thoughts and all our unknowns erupt into the forefront creating a palimpsest of layers of different elements and mechanisms. This allows for the seemingly irrational to become the key of unraveling the potential creative power of our unconscious.
Dreams do have structure. They are made of disconnected fragments of visual and auditory residue which are then transformed into various coherent yet unpredictable relationships with each progressive one contradicting the previous. Destroying only what it considers to be shackles limiting our vision.
This idea of discovery leads to both authorship and reader to exist simultaneously. The ideal way of creativity is to at points not be completely aware that the act of creativity is being pursued. Architecture is capable of enacting and expressing human identity, thought and consciousness.
These drawings, models and various manifestations of such allowed these self referential games that allow for playing of elements in relation to form of function or convention. Creativity and its flow to architecture is most free from its rules and form when it is in direct contradiction to those rules and form so historically tied to its significance.